Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

A comparison between alpha and delta waves of COVID-19, in Tunisia

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

INTRODUCTION: Several nations have seen an increase in COVID-19 cases in 2020, exhibiting a wave pattern. Different COVID-19 variants caused these waves. In this perspective, the aim of the study was to compare epidemiological, clinical and evolutive profile of COVID-19 infection during two waves of COVID-19. METHODS: Data collection was carried out using a questionnaire self-administered in French and Arabic developed with Google Forms and shared online via social media with weekly reminders. Duration of one month was enough to get the necessary number of participants calculated. The study included all Tunisians who were infected with COVID-19 at least once and agreed to participate in the study. Results: In total, 1328 COVID-19 patients were included. Eight hundred eighty-three patients were infected during the Alpha wave (66.5%) and 445 were infected during the Delta wave (33.5%). The median age was 37 years (interquartile range (IQR): 30-41 years). Clinically, during delta wave, these symptoms were more frequent; fever (57.8% versus 51.9%, p= 0.042), loss of smell (75.1% versus 65.1%, p On the other hand, aches were more frequent during Alpha wave (65.2% versus 56.2%, p = 0.001) and the impact of health professionals was greater (27.6% versus 15.7%, p≤10-3). CONCLUSION: The Alpha variant had more pronounced clinical symptoms than the Delta variant. This can be explained by the high vaccination coverage during the pandemic by the Delta variant.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
A comparison between alpha and delta waves of COVID-19, in Tunisia
Date Crossref
30/03/2025
Éditeur
Tunisian Society of Medical Sciences
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesImmune responses and vaccinations

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.