Aller au contenu principal
2025 article

Rating of Perceived Exertion as Prescription Tool to Maximize Oxygen Uptake Response during High-Intensity Interval Training

1Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : hr, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

PURPOSE: The aims of the study were to 1) investigate the prescriptive validity of Borg's category-ratio 10 rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scale for high-intensity interval training (HIIT) using the criterion of accumulated time ≥90% of maximal oxygen uptake (VO 2max ), 2) determine the optimal RPE category for HIIT prescription, and 3) analyze the physiological responses to RPE-prescribed HIIT sessions. METHODS: Seventeen (12 male) current and former physical education students (age: 24.2 ± 5 years, height: 181.3 ± 7.3, weight: 77.5 ± 12.2 kg; % body fat: 14.3 ± 4.3%) volunteered to participate in the study. Within four visits, separated by at least 48 hours, the participants performed a maximal incremental exercise test and three HIIT sessions. The HIIT sessions included three 3-minute intervals prescribed at RPE 6, 7, or 8, interspersed with 2-minute passive rest. RESULTS: Time ≥90% VO 2max and ≥90% maximal heart rate as well as mean and peak running speed, heart rate, VO 2 , respiratory frequency, peak minute ventilation (V E ), and blood lactate were all significantly lower in HIIT RPE6 compared with HIIT RPE7 and HIIT RPE8 , while there were no significant differences between HIIT RPE7 and HIIT RPE8 . Mean V E was significantly different between all three HIIT sessions, indicating the validity of RPE for HIIT prescription. CONCLUSIONS: RPE can be used to effectively prescribe long format HIIT sessions. RPE 7 appears to be an optimal prescription category as HIIT RPE7 elicited similar cardiovascular and metabolic responses to HIIT RPE8 but with lower ventilatory stress. V E appeared to be the main perceptual cue for the regulation of running speed, while VO 2 was mainly governed by the dynamics of running speed adjustments during HIIT intervals.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Rating of Perceived Exertion as Prescription Tool to Maximize Oxygen Uptake Response during High-Intensity Interval Training
Date Crossref
16/12/2025
Éditeur
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Cardiovascular and exercise physiologySports Performance and TrainingGenetics and Physical Performance

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.