Human norovirus persists longer than Escherichia coli in sandy soil, independent of plant decaying materials
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Human norovirus (HuNoV) is the leading cause of foodborne illnesses in the U.S. Fresh produce, often consumed raw, can serve as a vehicle for HuNoV transmission; however, limited data exist on its persistence in agricultural environments. This study evaluated the persistence of HuNoV GII, its cultivable surrogate Tulane virus, and Escherichia coli TVS 353 in sandy Florida agricultural soil. Soil samples with or without additional cilantro leaves (to simulate decaying plant debris) were incubated at 12 °C and tested for microbial concentrations at regular intervals over 29 weeks, using RNase RT-qPCR (both viruses), TCID 50 (Tulane virus), and plate count ( E. coli ). Inactivation kinetics were fitted to log-linear and non-linear models to estimate the weeks required for the first 1-log 10 reduction ( T 1 D ). Decaying cilantro leaves did not substantially impact microbial inactivation ( p > 0.05). E. coli declined most rapidly ( T 1 D = 2.2), followed by infectious Tulane virus ( T 1 D = 5.63), Tulane virus genome copies ( T 1 D = 11.8), and HuNoV GII genome copies ( T 1 D = 28). A strong correlation of Tulane virus infectivity with HuNoV GII RNase RT-qPCR ( r = 0.82) supported its suitability as a surrogate. Under the tested conditions, HuNoV’s prolonged persistence should be accounted for in risk assessments for preharvest fresh produce production.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Human norovirus persists longer than Escherichia coli in sandy soil, independent of plant decaying materials
- Date Crossref
- 15/12/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.