Predictors of elevated sperm DNA fragmentation: a morphology-based approach to semen analysis
Rattachement africain : ir. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Empirical evidence indicates that high levels of sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) negatively impact the results of both natural conception and assisted reproductive technology (ART). However, there is a notable absence of detailed guidelines for clinicians on which patient groups should be tested for SDF based on their semen analysis results. The goal of this study was to determine which sperm categorizations and morphological subcategorizations should be tested for sperm DNA integrity. RESULTS: Lowered sperm concentration, motility, progressive motility, and morphology, as well as a higher percentage of immature sperm, were linked to increased DNA Fragmentation Index (DFI) values. Higher DFI values were also found in semen samples from patients with two-sided varicoceles. The most significant intermediate correlation was identified between DFI and micro/partial head defects. Additionally, a low but significant correlation was observed in cases of combined oligo-astheno-teratozoospermia. CONCLUSION: Targeted DFI assessment is especially valuable for patients who have a two-sided varicocele, micro/partial head sperm defects, or combined oligo-astheno-teratozoospermia. Incorporating this assessment may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of male infertility evaluations.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Predictors of elevated sperm DNA fragmentation: a morphology-based approach to semen analysis
- Date Crossref
- 15/12/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.