A randomized clinical trial of app cognitive behavior therapy vs. HealthWatch for obsessive compulsive disorder
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
App-based cognitive behavioral therapy (app-CBT) addresses many treatment barriers. We randomized 120 U.S. adults with primary OCD (82.4% female, 77.5% White, mean age 40.1) between 7/2021 and 7/2023 to 12-weeks of coach-guided Perspectives (n = 60; app-CBT) or coach-guided HealthWatch (n = 60; an online well-being program). OCD severity (Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale; primary outcome) analyzed using a pre-registered mixed linear model showed a trend level group difference at post-treatment (ES = -0.47; p = 0.079). However, results from secondary and sensitivity analyses showed significantly better outcomes in Perspectives after adjusting for baseline differences or varying missing data assumptions (ps < 0.05). Response rates among completers were 65% in Perspectives and 41% in HealthWatch. Perspectives was also associated with greater pre-to-post-treatment improvement in functioning (ES = -0.55; p = 0.014). 83% of completers in Perspectives were mostly/very satisfied and 91% recommended the program vs. 43% and 53% in HealthWatch. Results highlight app-CBT as an effective and feasible treatment option for OCD that addresses dissemination obstacles.Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04136626 (Registration Date: 10/17/2019).
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A randomized clinical trial of app cognitive behavior therapy vs. HealthWatch for obsessive compulsive disorder
- Date Crossref
- 15/12/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.