Hype vs Reality in the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Workflows

Le résumé fourni par la source

Unlabelled: Artificial intelligence (AI) has the capacity to transform health care by improving clinical decision-making, optimizing workflows, and enhancing patient outcomes. However, this potential remains limited by a complex set of technological, human, and ethical barriers that constrain its safe and equitable implementation. This paper argues for a holistic, systems-based approach to AI integration that addresses these challenges as interconnected rather than isolated. It identifies key technological barriers, including limited explainability, algorithmic bias, integration and interoperability issues, lack of generalizability, and difficulties in validation. Human factors such as resistance to change, insufficient stakeholder engagement, and education and resource constraints further impede adoption, whereas ethical and legal challenges related to liability, privacy, informed consent, and inequity compound these obstacles. Addressing these issues requires transparent model design, diverse datasets, participatory development, and adaptive governance. Recommendations emerging from this synthesis are as follows: (1) establish standardized international regulatory and governance frameworks; (2) promote multidisciplinary co-design involving clinicians, developers, and patients; (3) invest in clinician education, AI literacy, and continuous training; (4) ensure equitable resource allocation through dedicated funding and public-private partnerships; (5) prioritize multimodal, explainable, and ethically aligned AI development; and (6) focus on long-term evaluation of AI in real-world settings to ensure adaptive, transparent, and inclusive deployment. Adopting these measures can align innovation with accountability, enabling health care systems to harness AI's transformative potential responsibly and sustainably to advance patient care and health equity.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.