Hyperglycemia and bladder cancer prognosis in a Finnish population-based cohort
Rattachement africain : fi, ee. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Diabetes might increase risk of bladder cancer (BCa) incidence and bladder cancer specific death. OBJECTIVE: To assess the potential association between diabetes and prognosis of BCa. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Register-based cohort study included 14,638 participants with BCa diagnosed in Finland during 1995-2012. Three databases were used to obtain information on BCa, diabetes and comorbidities. Hyperglycemia was determined by blood glucose or HbA1c. The role of antidiabetic medication use was also assessed. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Associations between diabetes and BCa-specific and overall mortality were evaluated using multivariable Cox regression models. RESULTS AND LIMITATION: During median follow-up of 4.3 years after BCa diagnosis 3,582 (24.5%) participants died of BCa. Diabetic post-diagnostic blood glucose level was associated with worse BCa-specific HR 1.58 (1.10-2.28) and overall survival HR 1.50 (1.20-1.89). The risk increase was slightly lower among hyperglycemic DM medication users (HR 1.43 (0,68-3.02) than non-users HR 1.80 (1.13-2.85). The main limitation of this study was insufficient information on tobacco smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes and diabetic glycemic status were associated with increased risk of both overall and BCa-specific death. PATIENT SUMMARY: In a Finnish population-based cohort study, diabetic bladder cancer patients had worse prognosis compared to non-diabetics. This was observed in both genders.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Hyperglycemia and bladder cancer prognosis in a Finnish population-based cohort
- Date Crossref
- 12/12/2025
- Éditeur
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.