A Categorical 4-Year Child Neurology Residency: It's Time
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract: Child neurology training has undergone minimal change over the decades, despite a rapid growth in subspecialty knowledge, patient volumes, and complexity. The current 5-year structure, which was established due to necessary historical compromises between pediatrics and neurology, is increasingly misaligned with modern clinical practice and educational priorities. Most child neurologists no longer pursue dual pediatrics certification, and few provide neurologic care to adult patients. Meanwhile, the field has expanded significantly in complexity and volume, making it a large enough specialty to sustain an independent curriculum. We propose a streamlined 4-year categorical residency model that integrates relevant components of pediatrics and adult neurology while centering training around child neurology from the start. This model, which aligns better with structures seen in comparable specialties, prioritizes flexibility and increases the opportunities for longitudinal mentorship and professional development. Thoughtful planning and collaboration will be essential to surmount challenges during the transition, including changes in board certification and alterations to institutional funding. Modernizing child neurology training is essential to better prepare future specialists, support recruitment and resident development, and meet the evolving needs of children with neurologic disorders.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A Categorical 4-Year Child Neurology Residency: It's Time
- Date Crossref
- 11/12/2025
- Éditeur
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.