AT2025ulz and S250818k: Deep X-Ray and Radio Limits on Off-axis Afterglow Emission and Prospects for Future Discovery
Résumé fourni par la source
Abstract The first joint electromagentic (EM) and gravitational-wave (GW) detection, known as GW170817, marked a critical juncture in our collective understanding of compact object mergers. However, it has now been 8 yr since this discovery, and the search for a second EM-GW detection has yielded no robust discoveries. Recently, on 2025 August 18, the LIGO–Virgo–KAGRA Collaboration reported a low-significance (high-false-alarm rate) binary neutron star merger candidate S250818k. Rapid optical follow-up revealed a single optical candidate AT2025ulz ( z = 0.08484) that initially appeared consistent with kilonova emission. We quickly initiated a set of observations with Swift, XMM-Newton, Chandra, and the Very Large Array to search for nonthermal afterglow emission. Our deep X-ray and radio search rules out that the optical rebrightening of AT2025ulz is related to the afterglow onset, reinforcing its classification as a stripped-envelope supernova (SN 2025ulz). We derive constraints on the afterglow parameters for a hypothetical binary neutron star merger at the distance of AT2025ulz (≈400 Mpc) based on our X-ray and radio limits. We conclude that our observational campaign could exclude a GW170817-like afterglow out to viewing angles of θ v ≈ 12 . ° 5. We briefly discuss the prospects for the future discovery of off-axis afterglows.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- AT2025ulz and S250818k: Deep X-Ray and Radio Limits on Off-axis Afterglow Emission and Prospects for Future Discovery
- Date Crossref
- 11/12/2025
- Éditeur
- American Astronomical Society
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.