Práticas de mediação literária na educação infantil
Résumé fourni par la source
Literary reading is seen as an essential activity in the social and school context, because it is a language practice that stimulates the imagination and sensitivity, and enables pedagogical actions that favor the formation of readers, especially with regard to Early Childhood Education. In view of this, this research assumes as a general objective to analyze actions of teacher reading mediation in literary reading activities in early childhood education, with the purpose of understanding how reading practices are thought and developed in the school context. For this, a field research was carried out, with a qualitative approach, which established as data collection instruments the observation and the registration in a field diary of the reading mediation actions of teachers working in Early Childhood Education. For data analysis, support is sought in studies of Bajour (2012), Colomer (2003, 2007, 2016) Goulart (2023), Petit (2009) on reading mediation, among other authors who discuss the theme. From the reflective analysis of the activities, it is concluded that the mediating action is essential to stimulate critical reflection, encourage dialogue on themes, characters and contexts. Literary mediation is related to the choice of books, the way of conducting questions about the text and interventions in relation to what children say about the text. Such actions allow exploring and expanding the possibilities of literary reading.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Práticas de mediação literária na educação infantil Literary mediation practices in early childhood education
- Date Crossref
- 26/06/2025
- Éditeur
- APESC - Associacao Pro-Ensino em Santa Cruz do Sul
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.