White Matter Dysfunction and Neurotransmitter Basis Underlying the Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
ABSTRACT Freezing of gait (FOG) is a severe and refractory motor complication in Parkinson's disease (PD). Although structural changes of white matter (WM) associated with FOG have been extensively studied, the functional alterations of WM remain unclear. This study aims to investigate WM dysfunction and the neurotransmitter basis underlying FOG in PD. The study compared the WM function among 29 PD with FOG patients (FOG), 31 PD without FOG patients (nFOG), and 31 healthy controls (HC) using amplitude of low‐frequency fluctuations (ALFF). Then, functional connectivity (FC) analysis was performed to examine connectivity patterns related to ALFF changes. Finally, correlations were explored between ALFF and FC findings and neurotransmitter receptors/transporters. We found decreased ALFF in the left superior longitudinal fasciculus, right corticospinal tract, and forceps major in FOG patients compared with nFOG and HC. The forceps major cluster showed increased FC with the insular, putamen, and prefrontal cortex in FOG patients. Although both metrics were significantly correlated with mGluR5 and GABA, the FC abnormalities were additionally correlated with dopamine, VAChT, and 5‐HT systems. This study reveals imaging dysfunction of WM and its neurotransmitter basis, offering a novel perspective on the neural mechanisms underlying the pathophysiology of FOG.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- White Matter Dysfunction and Neurotransmitter Basis Underlying the Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease
- Date Crossref
- 10/12/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.