Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Clinical and Demographic Predictors of Optic Neuritis Subtype

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
3Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us, ca. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

To determine which clinical features differentiate acute optic neuritis (ON) subtypes to support treatment decision-making in patients when the diagnostic work-up is incomplete or inconclusive. We performed a retrospective study at two academic centers. ON was classified as idiopathic/multiple sclerosis-associated (I/MS-ON; also known as “typical” ON) versus non-I/MS-ON (e.g. neuromyelitis optica; also known as “atypical” ON). Multiple linear regression models assessed the association between ON subtype and clinical features including: demographics, presence of optic disc edema, bilaterality (simultaneous ON involving both eyes), and baseline visual acuity (logMAR). Sensitivity analyses examined the impact of incomplete race/ethnicity data on subtype. Among 614 episodes (518 patients), most ON events (n = 440, 85%) were I/MS-ON. In univariate analyses, bilaterality (OR 6.67 [95%CI 3.7,11.11]), presence of optic disc edema (OR 2.22 [95%CI 1.32,3.70]), and age (OR 1.32 [95%CI 1.08,1.61] for each decade) were significantly associated with higher odds of having non-I/MS-ON compared to I/MS-ON. In multiple logistic regression modeling, each decade of life (OR 1.35 [95%CI 1.06,1.69]), bilaterality (OR 7.69 [95%CI 4.17,14.29]), and each point increase in baseline logMAR (OR 1.47 [95%CI 1.11,1.92]) were associated with increased odds of having non-I/MS-ON compared to I/MS-ON. In sensitivity analyses, age no longer significantly predicted ON subtype. When considering multiple clinical factors, bilateral simultaneous ON and worse baseline visual acuity were significantly associated with non-I/MS-ON. Older age may also be associated with non-I/MS-ON, but additional studies are needed. These observations may guide decision-making in patients with ON, in which diagnostic testing is incomplete or inconclusive.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Clinical and Demographic Predictors of Optic Neuritis Subtype
Date Crossref
09/12/2025
Éditeur
Informa UK Limited
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesOcular Diseases and Behçet’s SyndromeIntraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.