Integrated Surveillance for Human and Animal Brucellosis in Kenya: A Predictive Analysis
Résumé fourni par la source
Brucellosis is a bacterial zoonotic disease which poses a significant public health challenge globally. In Kenya, it is a priority zoonosis, causing morbidity and losses in humans and animals. Here, we used monthly surveillance data from 2014 to 2022 from the official human and animal health surveillance databases. We conducted spatiotemporal analysis, tested associations between human and animal brucellosis using Time Series Linear Models, and forecasted the incidence of human brucellosis for twelve months using Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (SARIMA) models. Our analysis revealed a significant disparity in brucellosis cases, with a much higher cumulative number of human cases (4,688,787) compared to animal cases (1214). Human incidence depicted a relatively stable trend, with occasional fluctuations. However, cattle and camel incidences displayed sporadic peaks and troughs. Only cattle brucellosis was significantly associated (estimate: 0.355; 95% CI: 0.004 to 0.707) with human brucellosis. SARIMA models demonstrated reasonable predictive accuracy for human incidence, but incorporating animal data did not significantly improve model performance. Our study highlights the weaknesses in the existing surveillance systems and the need for comprehensive evaluation of the systems and implementation of integrated surveillance to address gaps in surveillance, improve the accuracy of predictive analysis, and enhance early detection for zoonotic diseases.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Integrated Surveillance for Human and Animal Brucellosis in Kenya: A Predictive Analysis
- Date Crossref
- 09/12/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.