EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND DECISION MAKING: UNDERSTANDING THE MECHANISMS AND IMPLICATIONS

Le résumé fourni par la source

Decision-making in social, professional, and personal contexts is greatly influenced by emotional intelligence (EI). In order to clarify underlying mechanisms and implications, this paper examines the complex relationship between emotional intelligence and decision making. It outlines how Emotional Intelligence (EI) influences cognitive processes, information processing, and decision outcomes based on theoretical frameworks and empirical data. The dual-process theory, the affect infusion model, and Salovey and Mayer's model of emotional intelligence are some theoretical underpinnings that shed light on how emotions and cognition interact during decision-making. By reducing decision biases and promoting well-informed choices, emotional intelligence affects decision making through processes like self-awareness, emotional regulation, empathy, and cognitive flexibility. High EI is linked to improved interpersonal relationships, leadership efficacy, and decision making outcomes on an individual basis. Emotional intelligence (EI)-focused organizational cultures demonstrate creativity, teamwork, and flexible decision-making. Interventions targeted at improving emotional intelligence can help address societal issues like moral decision-making and conflict resolution. Emotional self-awareness exercises, mindfulness techniques, and integrating EI tests into organizational procedures are all methods for improving emotional intelligence. Multidisciplinary studies on the neural mechanisms underlying EI and decision-making, as well as longitudinal studies looking at EI development, are potential avenues for future research. In summary, emotional intelligence helps people make ethical, flexible, and well-informed decisions. It provides pathways to successfully navigating difficult situations and fostering success in a variety of spheres of life.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.