Tacrolimus Conversion in CYP3A5*1 Expressers: From Immediate-Release to LCP Formulation
Résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Tacrolimus is the most commonly used immunosuppressant drug in solid organ transplant recipients. Different formulations of tacrolimus have distinct pharmacokinetic profiles due to differences in absorption and elimination. This study aimed to investigate the influence of CYP3A5 polymorphisms on tacrolimus exposure after conversion from immediate-release tacrolimus (Tac-IR) to prolonged-release tacrolimus (Tac-LCP) in stable kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: Intensive pharmacokinetic sampling was performed in 19 kidney transplant recipients before and 1 month after switching from Tac-IR to Tac-LCP. Patients were genotyped for CYP3A5 polymorphisms. RESULTS: Patients expressing CYP3A5*1 required a significantly higher dose of Tac-IR than nonexpressers to achieve similar predose concentrations (C 0 ), maximum concentrations (C max ), and area-under-the-curve values (AUC 0-24h ). After switching to Tac-LCP, CYP3A5*1 expressers had similar C 0 values but significantly higher C max and AUC 0-24h values compared with nonexpressers . Dose-normalized exposure showed that CYP3A5*1 expressers had a lower conversion rate than nonexpressers (0.58 versus 0.807). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that CYP3A5 genotype should be considered when adjusting the tacrolimus dose during conversion from Tac-IR to Tac-LCP. C 0 values may not adequately reflect the higher exposure observed in CYP3A5*1 expressers , highlighting the importance of AUC 0-24 h in guiding dose adjustment.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Tacrolimus Conversion in CYP3A5*1 Expressers: From Immediate-Release to LCP Formulation
- Date Crossref
- 08/12/2025
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.