Relevance of cerebral microbleeds with leaky blood brain barrier in traumatic brain injury and protective role of interferon-gamma: A cohort study
Résumé fourni par la source
Objectives: Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs), which present as foci of hypointensities on T2*-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) are associated with weakened vessel walls. CMBs are also a frequent finding in traumatic brain injury (TBI) in association with poor outcome. We investigated whether a combination of susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI could accurately identify characteristics of CMBs that are most relevant to TBI. Materials and Methods: ranges of normal-appearing brain (NAB) areas were quantified and two sub-classes of CMBs-leaky and non-leaky CMBs-were identified. Characteristics and spatial distribution of the quantified imaging metrics and the immunological blood panel results were then compared across mild versus moderate-severe TBI groups, as classified by Glasgow Coma Scale. Results: More severe TBI was associated with CMBs exhibiting leaky BBB as quantified by DCE-MRI. Higher blood levels of interferon gamma (IFN-γ) were associated with lower number of CMBs in TBI patients at more than 8 days post-TBI. Discussion: combined DCE-MRI and SWI confirmed that CMBs with leaky BBBs are more prevalent in moderate-severe TBIs compared. Higher levels of IFN-γ appeared to have been associated with fewer CMBs in the sub-acute stage of TBI.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Relevance of cerebral microbleeds with leaky blood brain barrier in traumatic brain injury and protective role of interferon-gamma: A cohort study
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.