The Role of Renal Denervation in the Treatment of Hypertension in Canada: A Case-Based Discussion from the Canadian Hypertension Specialists Society

Le résumé fourni par la source

Over one-third of Canadians with hypertension do not achieve recommended blood pressure (BP) targets despite availability of effective treatments. Renal sympathetic nerve denervation (RDN) is a recently approved, minimally invasive treatment for hypertension being offered in multiple Canadian centers. How best to implement this procedure in contemporary Canadian clinical practice remains unclear. Herein, we provide a Canadian hypertension specialist viewpoint on use of RDN in Canada. We review the rationale for, and evidence supporting, the use of RDN and discuss, using 2 clinical cases, its potential therapeutic role. We note that RDN has effectively lowered BP in multiple, sham-controlled, randomized clinical trials and has a favorable safety profile. Economic models indicate that it is cost-effective in the Canadian context. Conversely, the BP-lowering effect is relatively modest; no well-established method to pre-identify responders exists; cardiovascular endpoint data supporting use of RDN are lacking; and no clear funding model is currently in place in Canada. Accordingly, we suggest that use of RDN be reserved for willing patients with severely elevated BP despite the use of first-line conventional therapies who have had secondary causes excluded. Examples include patients with resistant hypertension or moderate or severe hypertension and multiple drug intolerance syndrome. In view of its recent approval and known operator-dependency, RDN should be offered solely through programmatic, multidisciplinary collaboration between hypertension specialists and experienced interventionalists using a shared decision-making approach with the patient. Funding deployment should target such programs and sites should carefully monitor their outcomes to confirm comparability to the published literature.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.