HIV care indicators during the COVID-19 pandemic in relation to pre-pandemic care patterns among people with HIV in North Carolina
Résumé fourni par la source
The COVID-19 pandemic abruptly altered the way HIV care was accessed and delivered. We sought to assess HIV care indicators during the COVID-19 pandemic in relation to pre-pandemic HIV care patterns in North Carolina. Using statewide HIV surveillance data and group-based trajectory models, we identified pre-pandemic HIV care trajectories in two partially overlapping populations: (1) newly HIV-diagnosed from March 2014 through February 2018, followed from diagnosis to pandemic start (March 1, 2020); and (2) previously HIV-diagnosed before March 2016, followed from March 2016 to pandemic start. We analyzed pandemic-period HIV care indicators in both populations. In newly diagnosed persons, pre-pandemic HIV care attendance trajectories comprised "consistently high," "slowly fluctuating," "steadily decreasing," and "low U-shaped" groups. Trajectories in previously diagnosed persons were similar, although two distinct low groups replaced the "low U-shaped" group. In both populations, the "consistently high" groups had the highest predicted percentages of persons, while the "low" care groups had the lowest. HIV care indicators in the first pandemic year corresponded with pre-pandemic care patterns: most persons with high and fluctuating pre-pandemic care had an HIV laboratory record in the pandemic year, while most persons in the low care groups had no record in that year.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- HIV care indicators during the COVID-19 pandemic in relation to pre-pandemic care patterns among people with HIV in North Carolina
- Date Crossref
- 04/12/2025
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.