Assessing GP Trainee Awareness and Attitudes Toward an Integrated Care Programme for Older Persons (ICPOP)

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background The Integrated Care Programme for Older Persons (ICPOP) is a crucial gateway for general practitioners (GPs) to access multidisciplinary services for older adults with complex care needs. As the future of community care, it is essential that GP trainees are aware of these comprehensive pathways. This study aimed to assess the knowledge and attitudes of GP trainees toward a local ICPOP service. Methods A cross-sectional survey was developed using Google Forms and disseminated via organisational email and local messaging groups to 143 trainees enrolled in the Western GP Training Scheme. The survey assessed trainees’ awareness of ICPOP, understanding of referral criteria, and perceived impact of prior interactions with the service. Results A total of 61 GP trainees completed the survey, yielding a response rate of 42.6%. Most respondents were GP registrars (60.8%, n=37). While 82% (n=50) reported awareness of ICPOP, only 11.5% (n=7) felt confident identifying appropriate referral scenarios, and just 16% (n=10) understood the eligibility criteria. Among the 25 trainees who had previously referred patients to ICPOP, 92% (n=23) reported positive patient outcomes, and 64% (n=16) were highly satisfied with the care provided. Conclusion Despite high levels of general awareness of the service, there is a significant knowledge gap in GP trainees’ understanding of how and when to refer to ICPOP. Notably, those with experience of the service perceived a strong benefit to patient care. These findings highlight the importance of targeted education on ICPOP pathways during GP training. In response, the results of this survey will inform the development of a structured teaching session for trainees, aimed at improving familiarity with referral processes and enhancing integration of geriatric care within general practice.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.