Phantom for standardization in functional near-infrared spectroscopy, part 1: implementation and usage
Rattachement africain : jp, nl, de, us, it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Significance: The use of functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is expanding, including examples of devices approved for routine clinical use for specific indications. Instrument standardization is a critical element to facilitate clinical adoption. Currently, there is no published description of a phantom that meets the requirements of IEC 80601-2-71, the IEC/ISO standard for fNIRS equipment. Aim: We report an example of the implementation of the fNIRS standard phantom described in IEC 80601-2-71. We further report results from measurement campaigns with this phantom prototype in Japan and Europe. Approach: A phantom prototype was built and circulated among multiple academic and commercial fNIRS groups with diverse instrumentation. The phantom prototype was characterized by wavelength-dependent measurements of its diffuse optical features and utilized in a test for fNIRS signal magnitude as described in IEC 80601-2-71. Results: and between 3.5 and 3.6 dB, respectively. The test for fNIRS signal magnitude based on this phantom was successfully carried out on various commercial fNIRS devices. Conclusions: The characteristics of the phantom prototype agreed with the specifications in the standard. The phantom prototype proved suitable for the related test in IEC 80601-2-71.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Phantom for standardization in functional near-infrared spectroscopy, part 1: implementation and usage
- Date Crossref
- 05/12/2025
- Éditeur
- SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.