Lack of Fas/FasL Does Not Protect from Latent Herpes Simplex 1 Infection but Decreases Virus-Induced Neurodegeneration
Résumé fourni par la source
Many studies have shown an association between herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) infection and the development of neurodegeneration processes later in life, such as Alzheimer's disease. The Fas/FasL death pathway plays an important role in the complex regulation of the local inflammatory response and mounting of the specific antiviral response in HSV-1 infection. Here, we applied a mouse model of latent HSV-1 neuroinfection to Fas- and FasL-deficient mice (lpr and gld) to explore whether the lack of functional Fas/FasL pathway protects from inflammation-related neurodegeneration. The latently infected Fas- and FasL-deficient mice (lpr and gld) were not protected from virus replication despite the accumulation of virus-specific cytotoxic T cells. However, the lack of Fas/FasL pathway decreased neuroinflammation- and neurodegeneration-related markers, including cognitive impairment, amyloid-β protein, and tau hyperphosphorylation. The use of a glucocorticoid, dexamethasone, to decrease neuroinflammation in wild-type mice did not protect from cognitive impairment, despite the improved antiviral response. Our data indicate that excessive neuroinflammation via the Fas/FasL pathway during HSV-1 infection is associated with neurodegeneration. Furthermore, the administration of immunomodulatory agents to ameliorate the outcome of HSV-1 latent infection should be restricted to the peak of neuroinflammation.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Lack of Fas/FasL Does Not Protect from Latent Herpes Simplex 1 Infection but Decreases Virus-Induced Neurodegeneration
- Date Crossref
- 05/12/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.