An Evolving View of Lineage Diversification
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Systematists have long been fascinated by the astounding variation in species diversity across the various branches of the tree of life, a net result of the uneven rates at which lineages undergo speciation and extinction over time. The past 30 years have seen the development and widespread application of tools that allow diversification to be quantified and characterized in empirical data sets. These advances have, in turn, enabled the statistical evaluation of hypotheses about the causes behind the uneven distribution of species richness among lineages, leading to a more nuanced understanding of diversification rate variation, as reflected in an ever-expanding literature. Here, we provide a brief review of the current understanding of these models, the types of questions they address, and some of their collective limitations, with a focus on tree-based analyses of reconstructed phylogenies. Based on this overview, we outline future considerations in the lineage diversification research program, including the potential for machine learning to revolutionize the field by making model selection and parameter estimation more efficient in highly complex models. We interpret the recent slowdown in publication pace as a sign of a maturing field, where systematists are taking a step back after becoming better equipped to understand the technicalities and current limitations of these methods, leading to more careful applications and a greater embrace of uncertainty.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- An Evolving View of Lineage Diversification
- Date Crossref
- 05/12/2025
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.