Intelligent Traffic Management: Comparative Evaluation of YOLOv3, YOLOv5, and YOLOv8 for Vehicle Detection in Urban Environments in Montería, Colombia
Rattachement africain : co, br. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
This study compares the performance of three YOLO-based object detection models—YOLOv3, YOLOv5, and YOLOv8—for vehicle detection and classification at an urban intersection in Montería, Colombia. Recordings from five consecutive days, spanning three time slots, were used, totaling approximately 135,000 frames with variability in lighting and weather conditions. Frames were preprocessed by maintaining the aspect ratio and were normalized according to each model. The evaluation employed models pre-trained on COCO, without fine-tuning, enabling an objective assessment of their generalization capacity. Precision, recall, F1-score, and mAP@0.5 were computed globally and by vehicle class. YOLOv5 achieved the best balance between precision and recall (F1-score = 0.78) and the highest mAP (0.63), while YOLOv3 showed lower recall and mAP, and YOLOv8 performed competitively but slightly below YOLOv5. Cars and motorcycles were the most robust classes, whereas bicycles and trucks showed greater detection challenges. Visual evaluation confirmed stable performance on cloudy days and in light rain, with reduced accuracy under sunny conditions with high contrast. These findings highlight the potential of modern YOLO architectures for intelligent urban traffic monitoring and management. The generated dataset constitutes a replicable resource for future mobility research in similar contexts.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Intelligent Traffic Management: Comparative Evaluation of YOLOv3, YOLOv5, and YOLOv8 for Vehicle Detection in Urban Environments in Montería, Colombia
- Date Crossref
- 05/12/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.