No causal links between estradiol and female’s brain and mental health using Mendelian randomization
Rattachement africain : no, gb, de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The role of estradiol in depression and Alzheimer’s disease – brain disorders that disproportionately affect females – is debated. Results from observational studies are inconsistent and limited by confounding and reverse causation. To overcome these limitations, we perform two-sample Mendelian randomization. We run genome-wide association studies on sex-specific brain age gap, a proxy of brain health, and female-specific estradiol levels using data from the UK Biobank. We test for causal links between genetically-predicted factors related to estradiol exposure (estradiol levels in pre- and postmenopausal samples, reproductive span, age at menarche, age at menopause, number of childbirths) and brain age gap, Alzheimer’s disease and depression as outcomes. We replicate our analyses on estradiol levels in males. Here, we find no significant associations between estradiol exposure and brain health across samples and robust methods, indicating an absence of constant causal effects and suggesting that hormonal fluctuations may drive links between estradiol and brain health. Using Mendelian randomization, no causal links were found between estradiol exposure and brain age gap, Alzheimer’s disease and depression in females. The pattern was consistent for estradiol levels in pre- and postmenopausal samples and males.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- No causal links between estradiol and female’s brain and mental health using Mendelian randomization
- Date Crossref
- 05/12/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.