Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma: recommendations for next-generation sequencing
Rattachement africain : es. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Introduction: The integration of laboratory and clinical technologies and knowledge is key to an accurate diagnosis of hematologic neoplasms.Over the past decade, next-generation sequencing (NGS) has enabled the molecular characterization of these diseases, identifying mutations, copy number variations, and recurrent fusion genes.This advancement has driven the update of recommendations for the diagnosis and management of patients with hematologic neoplasms.Recent classifications by the World Health Organization (WHO), the International Consensus Classification (ICC), and the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) highlight the relevance of genetic data, incorporating them into their diagnostic and risk stratification algorithms.In this context, the implementation of targeted NGS panels is recommended for their ability to simultaneously analyze multiple genetic alterations.Objective: Although NGS is available in many laboratories, its use is not yet standardized, and there is no clear consensus on the methodology or the genes to be evaluated for each pathology.Material and method: The Molecular Biology Group in Hematology (GBMH), in collaboration with a panel of experts, developed this consensus guide.Results: Genes of interest were compiled based on their clinical relevance and scientific evidence.Conclusions: This guide aims to assist professionals in the use of targeted NGS panels in lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma: recommendations for next-generation sequencing
- Date Crossref
- 12/12/2025
- Éditeur
- Publicidad Permanyer, SLU
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.