Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 conference-abstract

Survival impact of anti-CD38-based quadruplet regimens in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: A network meta-analysis and reconstructed individual patient data meta-analysis

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
6Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : br. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Introduction: Frontline therapy for transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (TI-NDMM) has evolved significantly. Although triplet regimens have long constituted the standard of care, recent quadruplet combinations incorporating anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAb), daratumumab and isatuximab, have demonstrated improved response rates and progression-free survival (PFS). However, the impact on long-term outcomes, particularly overall survival (OS), remains uncertain. Methods: We conducted a systematic review, network meta-analysis (NMA), and reconstructed individual patient data meta-analysis (RIPDMA) to evaluate survival outcomes of quadruplet versus triplet lenalidomide-containing regimens in TI-NDMM. This study adhered to Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines and was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD420251033401). A comprehensive literature search through April 2025 identified randomized clinical trials (RCT) evaluating quadruplet and triplet regimens involving daratumumab, isatuximab, bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in any combination, compared to their backbone regimens, reporting OS and PFS. The NMA employed a frequentist random-effects model with P-scores for treatment ranking. Individual patient data were reconstructed from published Kaplan-Meier curves using the IPDfromKM method to enable pooled survival analyses. Hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to estimate comparative efficacy. Statistical analyses, along with forest plots and pooled survival curves, were conducted using and R Statistical Software (version 4.4.1). Results: Four RCT (CEPHEUS, IMROZ, MAIA, SWOG S0777) comprising 2,038 patients were included: D-VRd (n=197), I-VRd (n=265), D-Rd (n=368), VRd (n=614), and Rd (n=598). Median follow-up ranged from 58.7 to 89.3 months. Estimated 60-month PFS rates were: D-VRd (66.4%), I-VRd (63.2%), D-Rd (51.9%), and VRd (42.6%). Both D-VRd and I-VRd significantly improved PFS vs. D-Rd (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.48–0.87, P=0.003; and HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52–0.89, P=0.004) and vs. VRd (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.39–0.67, P<0.0001; and HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.41–0.67, P<0.0001). D-Rd also showed superior PFS over VRd (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.64–0.93; P=0.007). At 60 months, OS rates were: D-VRd (72.8%), I-VRd (72.2%), D-Rd (67.1%), and VRd (67.0%). When analyzed as grouped strategies, quadruplets achieved significantly superior outcomes at 60 months compared with triplets, with higher PFS (64.7% vs. 46.3%) and OS (72.5% vs. 67.1%). Pooled analysis confirmed improved PFS (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.47–0.69, P<0.0001) and OS (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.63–0.96, P=0.02) for quadruplets. The OS benefit of quadruplets remained consistent when compared with each triplet regimen: against D-Rd (HR 0.77; 95% CI: 0.60–0.98; P=0.04) and against VRd (HR 0.77; 95% CI: 0.62–0.97; P=0.02). In a sensitivity analysis excluding patients aged <65 years from SWOG S0777 and those who deferred transplant in CEPHEUS, the OS advantage of quadruplet regimens persisted (73.5% vs. 65.4%; HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.55–0.87; P = 0.001). Robustness analyses confirmed the OS benefit, with bootstrap-derived HR (0.64; 95% CI 0.62–0.83) aligning with the primary estimate and minimal impact observed in leave-one-out analyses. In the NMA, D-VRd and I-VRd ranked highest in probability of achieving complete response or better (P-scores: 0.9876 and 0.7318), PFS (0.8668 and 0.8114), and OS (0.7043 and 0.8328). Conclusions: This meta-analysis provides the first comprehensive comparative assessment of anti-CD38-mAb based quadruplet versus triplet regimens in TI-NDMM, demonstrating a significant overall survival advantage and supporting quadruplet regimens as the most effective frontline treatment.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Survival impact of anti-CD38-based quadruplet regimens in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: A network meta-analysis and reconstructed individual patient data meta-analysis
Date Crossref
03/11/2025
Éditeur
American Society of Hematology
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Prefeitura Municipal de Campos dos Goytacazes pays non établi dans la notice
    Organisme public
  • Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Universidade Federal da Bahia pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Sociedade Brasileira de Oncologia Clínica pays non établi dans la notice
    Structure de recherche
  • São Germano Oncologia pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Salvador pays non établi dans la notice
    Institution
  • São Paulo pays non établi dans la notice
    Institution
  • Pesquisa e Inovação pays non établi dans la notice
    Institution

Prefeitura Municipal de Campos dos Goytacazes, Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) et Universidade Federal da Bahia, avec 6 autres affiliations.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Multiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsCancer Treatment and PharmacologyStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.