Defining and Predicting HIV Immunological Non-Response: A Multi-Definition Analysis from an Indonesian Cohort
Rattachement africain : id, us, jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Immunological non-response (INR) to antiretroviral therapy (ART) is a critical concern for PLHIV, characterized by inadequate CD4+ T-cell recovery despite virological suppression. This retrospective study analyzed medical records of virologically suppressed adult PLHIV on ART (2004–2024) at two hospitals in Surabaya, Indonesia, using four operational categories to identify clinical and demographic determinants of INR. Patients were classified as immunological responders (IRs) or non-responders (INRs) based on four definitions: INR1 (CD4+ gain < 100 cells/mm3), INR2 (CD4+ < 350 cells/mm3), INR3 (meeting of either criterion), and INR4 (meeting of both criteria). Of 464 patients, 382 were analyzed. Baseline CD4+ < 200 cells/mm3 strongly predicted INR2 (aOR = 5.60, 95% CI: 2.95–10.62) and INR3 (aOR = 4.46, 95% CI: 2.39–8.29), while anal sexual transmission was protective against INR2 (aOR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.19–0.92) and INR3 (aOR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.19–0.89). By month 12, IR groups had over 350 CD4+ cells/mm3, with faster recovery slopes in months 0–6 (IR: >20 vs. INR: <10 cells/mm3/month). INR1 and INR4 had flat or negative slopes at 12–24 months, while IR groups had positive slopes. Baseline CD4+ was the strongest INR predictor, suggesting the value of early ART and individualized care for Indonesian PLHIV.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Defining and Predicting HIV Immunological Non-Response: A Multi-Definition Analysis from an Indonesian Cohort
- Date Crossref
- 04/12/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.