Software effort estimation based on inception network optimized by enhanced banyan tree growth optimizer
Résumé fourni par la source
The ability to estimate the cost of software projects is critical to achieving project success, however, standard estimation methods fail on their promise due to the complicated relationships that exist within project data. This paper proposes a new hybrid approach that combines an Inception Network with Enhanced Banyan Tree Growth Optimizer (EBTGO) for improved accuracy. The Inception Network can capture hierarchical features better from the high-dimensional data set, while EBTGO optimizes hyperparameters to improve model performance. Our two benchmark dataset experiments, the Maxwell (1995) and COCOMO81 (Boehm, 1981) data sets, confirm that the hybrid model outperforms the state-of-the-art in each round of testing and across all evaluation metrics including Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Magnitude of Relative Error (MMRE), and others. The statistical tests provide evidence that the added improvements are at least reasonably significant. The visual analyses, including receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and confusion matrices, reinforce that the model is robust. In addition, this paper demonstrates the limitations of traditional and machine learning approaches for estimation and shows the potential of deep learning and metaheuristic optimization for predicting software effort. Finally, this is an optimistic advancement toward predictive modeling in software engineering.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Software effort estimation based on inception network optimized by enhanced banyan tree growth optimizer
- Date Crossref
- 04/12/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.