Translation, validity and reliability of the Turkish Chronic Illness Job Strain Scale (CIJSS) in people with inflammatory arthritis
Résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Objective This study aimed to adapt the Chronic Illness Job Strain Scale (CIJSS) into Turkish and evaluate its validity and reliability in individuals with rheumatologic conditions. Methods The CIJSS was culturally adapted following Beaton’s protocol. Construct validity was assessed using Rasch analysis. Concurrent validity was examined through correlations with work-related [Work Limitation Questionnaire-Short Form (WLQ-SF), Rheumatoid Arthritis Work Instability Scale (RA-WIS), Work Productivity and Activity Impairment General Health V2.0 (WPAI-GH)] and health-related [Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID)] measures. Test–retest reliability was assessed 2 weeks later. Results The CIJSS demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.96) and excellent test–retest reliability (Spearman’s r = 0.886; ICC(2,1) = 0.88). The scale met Rasch model requirements for fit. Significant correlations were observed between the CIJSS total score and the WLQ total score (r = –0.61), WPAI scores (r = 0.19–0.47), HAQ (r = 0.33), and RAID (r = 0.61), supporting concurrent validity. Conclusions The Turkish CIJSS is a valid, reliable, and culturally appropriate tool for assessing job strain in individuals with inflammatory arthritis. It can support both clinical assessment and vocational rehabilitation planning for Turkish-speaking populations.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Translation, validity and reliability of the Turkish Chronic Illness Job Strain Scale (CIJSS) in people with inflammatory arthritis
- Date Crossref
- 02/12/2025
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.