Occlusion-Resilient Instance Segmentation of Surgical Instrument Parts Using YOLO and Generative Adversarial Networks for Minimal Invasive Robotic Surgery
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Accurate segmentation of surgical instruments is critical for improving safety and precision in minimally invasive robotic surgery. However, real-world surgical scenes often involve occlusions, overlapping instruments, and visual noise, such as blood or glare, which challenge conventional segmentation models. To address these limitations, we propose SurgSeg-GAN, a hybrid instance segmentation framework that integrates a fine-tuned YOLOv11 model with a Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) designed to generate occlusion masks and recover missing features. Our method is validated on the publicly available EndoVis 2017 and EndoVis 2018 surgical instrument segmentation datasets. SurgSeg-GAN achieves a mean Intersection over Union (mIoU) of 77% and a Dice coefficient of 90% on EndoVis 2017, and mIoU of 71% and Dice coefficient of 87% on EndoVis 2018-outperforming several state-of-the-art instance segmentation. Integrating occlusion-aware GANs enables the recovery of instrument parts even under partial visibility, enhancing model robustness and generalizability. These results demonstrate that SurgSeg-GAN significantly improves segmentation accuracy in challenging surgical environments, contributing to safer and more reliable real-time guidance in robotic-assisted procedures.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Occlusion-Resilient Instance Segmentation of Surgical Instrument Parts Using YOLO and Generative Adversarial Networks for Minimal Invasive Robotic Surgery
- Date Crossref
- 14/07/2025
- Éditeur
- IEEE
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.