Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Rationale and design of a PROBE trial comparing continuous enteral nutrition to time-restricted enteral nutrition in severe stroke

1Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
4Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Continuous enteral nutrition treatment is routinely provided in the intensive care unit (ICU) for patients with critically ill stroke and contributes to circadian rhythm disruption because a time-limited diet is part of the normal biological rhythm of diurnal species. Our study aims to evaluate the safety as well as the effectiveness of time-restricted enteral nutrition in ICU patients who have had a severe stroke. METHODS AND DESIGN: The Time-restricted Enteral Nutrition vs continuous Enteral nutriTion (TENET) research is a multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-blinded, endpoint trial that compares continuous enteral nutrition to time-restricted enteral nutrition in persons who have had a severe stroke. People with severe stroke who score ≥11 points on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) or ≤12 points on the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) will be included and randomly assigned to restrict the duration of daytime enteral nutrition to 8-12 hours (time-limited enteral nutrition group) or a 24-hour cycle of continuous enteral nutrition (control group). Until the patient stops receiving enteral nutritional support, passes away, is moved out of the ICU or enteral nutrition is used for 28 days, whichever occurs first, enteral nutritional support will continue. Every patient will have a 90-day follow-up. STUDY OUTCOMES: A poor 90-day functional prognosis (which is indicated by a ≥3 points modified Rankin scale (mRS) score) is the primary efficacy endpoint. The secondary efficacy endpoints include the GCS, NIHSS, mRS, the Barthel index (all recorded at discharge), the 90-day Barthel index and the duration of ICU stay. The safety outcomes include adverse events and serious adverse events during hospitalisation, along with the 28- and 90-day mortality. DISCUSSION: Clinical evidence for the safety as well as effectiveness of time-restricted enteral nutrition in persons with severe stroke will be provided by this TENET study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06161948.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Rationale and design of a PROBE trial comparing continuous enteral nutrition to time-restricted enteral nutrition in severe stroke
Date Crossref
03/12/2025
Éditeur
BMJ
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyNutrition and Health in AgingDysphagia Assessment and Management

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune donnée externe enregistrée en base. Sources et limites.