Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Factors Influencing SurgeCon Implementation in Four Canadian Emergency Departments Guided by Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

2Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : ca, pl. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) overcrowding remains a significant national issue in Canada. To address this issue, SurgeCon, a quality improvement program, was implemented to enhance patient flow, improve communication, and reduce wait times. Despite their potential, interventions like SurgeCon lack evidence on real-world implementation and sustainability in high-pressure, resource-limited ED settings. OBJECTIVE: This study explores the factors influencing the implementation of SurgeCon in four Canadian EDs using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to identify facilitators and barriers. METHODS: Data were collected over 2.5 years-before, during, and after SurgeCon implementation-in two rural and two urban EDs in Canada using a longitudinal qualitative research (LQR) design. Forty-two semi-structured interviews with physicians, nurses, and hospital managers were analyzed through inductive and deductive thematic analysis, guided by the CFIR framework. RESULTS: Facilitators were predominantly associated with CFIR's Innovation Characteristics, particularly the perceived benefits of real-time data collection, workflow optimization, and enhanced communication. However, barriers-mainly linked to outer setting (COVID-19 disruptions), inner setting (resource constraints and fragmented communication), and individual characteristics (leadership engagement and motivation)-outweighed these advantages. CONCLUSION: To strengthen adoption, this study proposes eight strategic action plans focusing on leadership commitment, automation, cross-departmental collaboration, feedback loops and change management strategies to maximize facilitators and address implementation barriers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT04789902. 10/03/2021.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Factors Influencing SurgeCon Implementation in Four Canadian Emergency Departments Guided by Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
Date Crossref
02/12/2025
Éditeur
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Emergency and Acute Care StudiesHealth Policy Implementation ScienceDisaster Response and Management

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.