Long-term Follow-up of Resected EGFR-mutated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-world Study in a Portuguese Centre
Résumé fourni par la source
Surgically resected epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated non-small cell lung cancer continues to carry a substantial risk of recurrence. The aim of this retrospective, single-center study, conducted at a Portuguese tertiary hospital was to evaluate the clinical course of these patients, diagnosed between 2016 and 2020, with the final clinical data review in November, 2024. A total of 48 patients were included, predominantly female (72.9%) and non-smokers (70.8%), most presenting exon 21 L858R or exon 19 deletion mutations. Mutations were identified by Sanger sequencing or next-generation sequencing. Programmed death-ligand 1 expression was < 1% in 58.3% of cases. At a median follow-up of 73.6 months, 31.3% of patients experienced relapse, all progressing to stage IV disease. The five-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 70% and 81%, respectively. Staging significantly influenced prognosis, with five-year disease-free survival ranging from 84% in stage IB to 20% in stage III. No significant differences were observed between epidermal growth factor receptor mutation subtypes. These findings are consistent with previous real-world studies and the placebo arm of the ADAURA trial, supporting the use of adjuvant osimertinib to reduce recurrence and improve long-term outcomes, while also emphasizing the need for improved perioperative risk assessment - including staging, histopathologic features, and molecular and genetic profiling - to guide personalized treatment.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Long-term Follow-up of Resected EGFR-mutated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-world Study in a Portuguese Centre
- Date Crossref
- 02/12/2025
- Éditeur
- Ordem dos Medicos
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.