Early Detection of Neonatal Infection in NICU Using Machine Learning Models: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study

Résumé fourni par la source

Introduction Neonatal infections remain a major threat in intensive care units (ICUs), often progressing rapidly and asymptomatically within the first hours of admission. Early detection is critical to improve outcomes, yet timely and reliable risk prediction remains a challenge. Method We developed an explainable machine learning retrospective observational cohort study for early prediction of neonatal infection using high-resolution data from the MIMIC-III database. Two-time windows, 30 and 120 minutes post-ICU admission, were analyzed. Physiological and hematological variables were aggregated, and missing data were imputed using Iterative Imputation. We used stratified five-fold cross-validation to test several classification models and feature importance and SHAP analysis to examine model interpretability. Result CatBoost demonstrated the best performance in the 30-minute window (F1-score = 0.76), and Gradient Boosting had the best performance in the 120-minute window (F1-score ≈ 0.80). Heart rate, white blood cell count, and temperature were important predictors because they showed both physiological stability and immune response. The 120-minute window made the model work better, indicating the importance of data availability for making accurate predictions. Discussion CatBoost at the 30-minute window and Gradient Boosting at the 120-minute window could find a balance between speed and accuracy. Model-based imputation could handle high missing-value rates, but external validation is needed because the data came from only one center and the devices were different. Conclusion This study proposes a two-stage decision-support system that adapts to data collected during early and later ICU admission periods. By combining accurate prediction with model interpretability, the framework may enable timely diagnosis and targeted interventions, ultimately reducing neonatal morbidity and mortality.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.