Randomized Trial Evaluating a Tailored eHealth Intervention for Symptom Management in Couples Managing Prostate Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic (Preprint)
Résumé fourni par la source
UNSTRUCTURED Background: This randomized controlled trial evaluated the efficacy of the “Prostate Cancer (PCa) Education & Resources for Couples” (PERC) eHealth intervention to improving the outcomes for patients and their partners. Methods: We enrolled 280 dyads (560 individuals) of patients with localized PCa who recently completed treatment, and their partners. Dyads were randomized to PERC or a control group who accessed an an NCI PCa website. Validated questionnaires assessed quality of life (QOL, FACT-G total; primary outcomes) and FACT-G subdomains, symptom and psychosocial measures (secondary outcomes) at baseline and 4, 8, and 12 months (T1-T4). Multilevel linear mixed models tested intervention effects. Results: FACT-G total, subdomain, and overall overall psychosocial outcomes did not differ significantly between groups over time. PERC patients reported marginally higher physical QOL (95% CI: –0.1 to 1.9, d=0.33), better illness appraisal (95% CI: 0.0 to 0.4, d=0.38), lower pain (95% CI: –5.3 to –0.2, d=0.38) at T4, and less frequent fatigue across time (95% CI: –3.9 to –0.4). PERC partners reported less urinary symptom bother at T3 (95% CI: -1.0 to14.1, d=0.44). Discussion: PERC demonstrated exploratory benefits including patients’ improved physical QOL, less fatigue, lower pain, improved illness appraisal in patients, and less urinary bother in partners.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Randomized Trial Evaluating a Tailored eHealth Intervention for Symptom Management in Couples Managing Prostate Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic (Preprint)
- Date Crossref
- 30/11/2025
- Éditeur
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.