Electrochemical Immunosensor for Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Virus
Rattachement africain : Égypte. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The COVID-19 pandemic has emphasized the need for rapid, affordable, and reliable SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic tools suitable for decentralized use. Although RT-PCR remains the gold standard, its high cost, technical complexity, and slow processing limit its practicality for point-of-care testing. This study presents a screen-printed electrochemical immunosensor designed for fast and sensitive detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigens in clinical samples. The sensor incorporates a dual-working electrode configuration that enables real-time internal referencing and employs a graphene/titanium dioxide (TiO₂) nanocomposite to improve electron transfer and signal responsiveness. An optimized 90:10 (w/w) graphene-to-TiO₂ ratio, identified through cyclic voltammetry, provided the strongest electrochemical performance. One working electrode was functionalized with anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, while the second acted as a reference; antigen binding caused current suppression measured by differential pulse and square-wave voltammetry. The system achieved a detection limit of 0.58 ng/mL, a quantification limit of 1.77 ng/mL, and demonstrated high accuracy (102 ± 2.6%) and precision (RSD = 4.3%) in spiked serum. By combining nanomaterial synergy with low-cost screen-printing, this immunosensor offers a scalable, field-ready platform that supports rapid and reliable SARS-CoV-2 detection, particularly in resource-limited settings.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Electrochemical Immunosensor for Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Virus
- Date Crossref
- 25/11/2025
- Éditeur
- Egyptian Knowledge Bank
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.