Network-Level Brain Dysfunction Beyond the Lesion: A Rare Case of Monakow Syndrome Presenting With Fluctuating Consciousness and Left Hemispatial Neglect Due to Right Anterior Choroidal Artery Infarction
Le résumé fourni par la source
Anterior choroidal artery (AChA) infarction typically manifests as the classical triad of contralateral hemiparesis, hemisensory loss, and homonymous hemianopia (Monakow syndrome). We report a rare case of right AChA infarction presenting with fluctuating consciousness and left hemispatial neglect, accompanied by widespread functional suppression of the right cerebral hemisphere. A 65-year-old right-handed man initially exhibited mild dysarthria and left-sided sensory impairment, with no acute lesions on diffusion-weighted MRI. He subsequently developed impaired consciousness and hemispatial neglect. Follow-up MRI demonstrated acute infarcts in the posterior limb of the internal capsule (PLIC) and lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN). Arterial spin labeling (ASL) and N-isopropyl-p-[123I]iodoamphetamine single-photon emission computed tomography (IMP-SPECT) revealed extensive right-hemispheric hypoperfusion, disproportionate to the structural lesion. Recent evidence indicates that the PLIC and LGN function as major network hubs rather than simple relay pathways. Local injury to these hubs may disrupt global network efficiency, producing functional diaschisis. This case highlights the need to consider network-level dysfunction in AChA infarction.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Network-Level Brain Dysfunction Beyond the Lesion: A Rare Case of Monakow Syndrome Presenting With Fluctuating Consciousness and Left Hemispatial Neglect Due to Right Anterior Choroidal Artery Infarction
- Date Crossref
- 30/11/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.