Effects of LED red and blue light quality on the growth and photosynthetic characteristics of Philodendron 'con-go' hydroponic seedlings
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Philodendron 'con-go' was used to study the effects of different red-to-blue light ratios on its physiological indices. Six light treatments were applied: Fluorescent Daylight Lamp (CK), and RB (100% Blue, 60% R + 40% B, 70% R + 30% B, 80% R + 20% B, 100% Red) via LEDs. Results showed both red and blue light benefited Philodendron 'con-go' growth. Red light aided underground dry matter accumulation and photosynthetic pigment buildup, while blue light helped aboveground dry matter accumulation and root activity enhancement. Under the 6:4 treatment, Philodendron 'con-go' displayed better morphological parameters, chlorophyll content, photosynthetic parameters, and antioxidant enzyme activity. The 6:4 group's chlorophyll a, b, and carotenoids were 43.79%, 154.76%, and 112.28% higher than CK. In chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, the 6:4 group had 72.73% and 83.33% higher ΦPSII and qP, and 21.33% lower NPQ than CK. The optimal treatment increased Pn by 32.35% and E by 40% compared to CK. For antioxidant enzyme activity, the 6:4 group's SOD was 67.17% higher than CK. Overall, the 6:4 treatment is a suitable indoor light environment and is recommended for Philodendron production and application.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Effects of LED red and blue light quality on the growth and photosynthetic characteristics of <i>Philodendron</i> 'con-go' hydroponic seedlings
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2025
- Éditeur
- Maximum Academic Press
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.