Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Screening for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence After Liver Transplantation: Prospective Validation of Binary Criteria

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
8Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Many centers screen all recipients for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT). This approach may add substantial burdens of cost, incidental findings, and, depending on the imaging modality, radiation and/or contrast-induced complications. We created simple criteria to help clinicians identify low-risk patients in whom post-LT surveillance offers marginal utility. METHODS: Criteria were developed retrospectively using adults with HCC who underwent LT at the University of Cincinnati from 2000 to 2014. Low-risk patients had none of the following at LT: (1) outside Milan criteria, (2) alpha-fetoprotein ≥ 200 ng/mL, (3) prior hepatectomy with vascular invasion or unknown histology, and (4) any vascular invasion or > 3 lesions on explant, or extrahepatic extension noted intraoperatively. Criteria were retrospectively validated in adults transplanted for HCC at Mass General Brigham from 2015 to 2023 and prospectively assessed at Cincinnati where low-risk patients received no post-LT surveillance. RESULTS: Among 132 development cohort patients, 14 (10.6%) developed recurrent HCC at a median of 2.0 (range 0.1-9.7) years. Only 1 (1.1%) of the 91 (68.9%) patients deemed low-risk by the proposed criteria developed recurrence compared to 13 (31.7%) of the high-risk patients (p < 0.001). In the validation cohort (n = 188), recurrence occurred in 1 (0.9%) of 114 (60.6%) low-risk and 16 (21.6%) high-risk patients. In the prospective cohort (n = 55), none of 42 (76.4%) low-risk patients developed recurrence versus 3 (23.1%) high-risk patients (p = 0.011) after 8.0 (0.1-9.4) years of follow-up. The criteria performed similarly to the RETREAT score 0 across cohorts (n = 375) in identifying patients without recurrence as low-risk (negative predictive value 99.2% vs. 97.1%) but required screening significantly fewer patients (34.1% vs. 81.9%). CONCLUSIONS: These prospectively validated criteria offer clinicians a practical tool for easily and accurately determining which patients would benefit from surveillance for HCC recurrence after LT. Surveillance targeting only high-risk patients could reduce the harms of excess screening.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Screening for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence After Liver Transplantation: Prospective Validation of Binary Criteria
Date Crossref
29/11/2025
Éditeur
Wiley
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and PrognosisOrgan Transplantation Techniques and OutcomesLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.