Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 review

Effectiveness of strategies for implementing guideline-concordant care in low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

1Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
5Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Background: International low back pain guidelines recommend providing education/advice to patients, discouraging routine imaging use, and encouraging judicious prescribing of analgesics. However, practice variation occurs and the effectiveness of implementation strategies to promote guideline-concordant care is unclear. This review aims to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness of implementation strategies to promote guideline-concordant care for low back pain. Methods: Five databases (including MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) were searched from inception until 22nd August 2024. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated strategies to promote guideline-concordant care (providing education/advice, discouraging routine imaging use, and/or reducing analgesic use) among healthcare professionals or organisations were included. Two reviewers independently conducted screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessments. The primary outcome was guideline-concordant care in the medium-term (>3 months but <12 months), measured by the rate of patients receiving such care. The taxonomy recommended by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) group was used to categorise implementation strategies. Meta-analysis with a random effects model was conducted where possible. This systematic review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42023452969). Findings: = 75%). There was insufficient evidence to indicate one implementation strategy was superior to another in the medium-term. Interpretation: Implementing guideline recommendations delivered mixed effects in promoting guideline-concordant care for low back pain management. Further research is needed to establish the effectiveness of implementation strategies for specific guideline-concordant care practices in low back pain. Funding: There was no funding source for this review.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Effectiveness of strategies for implementing guideline-concordant care in low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Date Crossref
01/12/2025
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationSpine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyClinical practice guidelines implementation

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.