Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

120P In development: Fully automatic treatment benefit prediction in advanced colorectal cancer patients

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
8Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : nl, cw. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: Accurate and reproducible assessment of HER2 IHC is essential for the appropriate selection of targeted therapies, especially in HER2 low or ultralow tumors.Yet, interobserver and inter-scanner variability hinder diagnostic consistency.AI could enhance accuracy and reproducibility, but large-scale, real-world evidence across diverse scanners is scarce.Methods: We analyzed 2,015 HER2 IHC-stained breast cancer slides collected from 14 centers using seven widely deployed scanner systems (Roche, Leica, Olympus, Morphle, Philips, 3D Histech, KFBIO).Consensus ground-truth HER2 scores were established by expert pathologists without AI.Subsequently, two pathologists at each institution scored ∼150 cases manually and, after a washout period, with AI support.Scoring followed ASCO/CAP 2023 HER2 guidelines, with IHC 0 further subclassified into "null" and "ultralow.". Results:In an interim analysis, fully-autonomous scoring by AI demonstrated a 4.1% higher median accuracy compared to manual scoring.Median accuracy across centers and scanners was increased from 75.4% to 80.0% when pathologists used AI for decision support.Accuracy increased from 70.2% to 77.3% on the subset of data from Roche scanners, 79.6% to 83.2% on Leica, and 73.5% to 76.6% on other scanners.Similarly, median interobserver agreement improved from 73.4% at baseline to 86.05% with AI assistance (Roche: 59.4% to 82.5%; Leica: 74.4% to 89.5%; Others: 73.8% to 82.2%).Crucially, when HER2-ultralow was included as a fifth scoring category, median interobserver agreement increased from 68.0% at baseline to 82.0% with AI assistance (Roche: 47.1% to 75.6%, Leica: 69.8% to 86.9%, Others: 67.4% to 77.5%).Conclusions: This follow-up analysis demonstrates that AI assistance consistently improved accuracy and interobserver agreement in HER2 IHC interpretation across scanner platforms.Overall, our findings support the integration of AI into routine diagnostic workflows to reduce variability and enhance reproducibility of HER2 IHC scoring.Particularly in the clinically challenging HER2 low and ultralow categories, AI may improve personalized treatment decision making for HER2-targeted therapies.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
120P In development: Fully automatic treatment benefit prediction in advanced colorectal cancer patients
Date Crossref
01/11/2025
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesColorectal Cancer Surgical TreatmentsCancer Genomics and Diagnostics

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.