AGRONOMIC PERFORMANCE OF COWPEA [VIGNAUNGUICULATA(L.) WALP.] VARIETIES AS INFLUENCED BYCOMBINED APPLICATION OF POULTRY MANURE AND MINERAL FERTILIZER IN TWO AGRO-ECOLOGICAL ZONES OF BURKINA FASO
Rattachement africain : Nigéria, Burkina Faso. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Field experimentwas laid ina split plot design in 2019 and 2020 at rainy seasonsat Farako-Ba in soudanianandKamboinse insoudano-sahelian agro-ecological zones of Burkina Faso. The fertilizer levels (0 kg/ha, 100 kg/ha NPK as control, 60 kg/ha NPK + 1.5 t/ha poultrymanure, 100 kg/ha NPK + 1.5 t/ha poultry manure and 75 kg/ha TSP (P205) + 1.5 t/ha poultry manure) occupied the main plots while the cowpea varieties (KVx745-11P, Komcalle, Tiligre and Neerwaya) were assigned to thesub-plots. The results of the study showed that location as well as fertilizer application rate have significantly affected most of agronomic characters. The average yield recorded in Farako-Ba were 1013.79 kg/ha and 1030.51 kg/ha for 2019 and 2020 while in Kamboinse it was 1166.59 kg/ha and 1165.03 kg/ha, in 2019 and 2020, respectively. The highest grain yield was recorded with combined application of poultry manure with mineral fertilizer at 100 kg/ha NPK + 1.5 t/ha poultry manure.This was followedby 75 kg/ha TSP (P205) + 1.5 t/ha poultry manure.Theresults suggest that combinedapplication of poultry manure and chemical fertilizer can restore soils and lead to high yields in cowpea.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- AGRONOMIC PERFORMANCE OF COWPEA [VIGNAUNGUICULATA(L.) WALP.] VARIETIES AS INFLUENCED BYCOMBINED APPLICATION OF POULTRY MANURE AND MINERAL FERTILIZER IN TWO AGRO-ECOLOGICAL ZONES OF BURKINA FASO
- Date Crossref
- 31/10/2025
- Éditeur
- Jana Publication and Research LLP
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.