Efficacy and Safety of the C5 Inhibitor Crovalimab in Patients With Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
Rattachement africain : br, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the C5‐inhibitor crovalimab in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH). Methods PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies on the use of the C5 inhibitor crovalimab in patients with PNH. Outcomes included hemolysis control (HC: LDH ≤ 1.5 × ULN), stabilized hemoglobin (SH), transfusion avoidance (TA), and safety endpoints. Pooled estimates were calculated using random‐effects models with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and heterogeneity was assessed via the I 2 statistic. Results Four studies involving 275 patients were included. Pooled prevalence of HC was 83% (95% CI: 0.75–0.91), SH in 61% (95% CI: 0.48–0.75), and TA in 65% (95% CI: 0.56–0.74). At least one any‐grade Adverse Event (AEs) occurred in 90% (95% CI: 0.78–0.99), while Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) occurred in 14% (95% CI: 0.05–0.23). Treatment‐related AEs affected 47%, and infections occurred in 50%. Grade 3–5 AEs were seen in 19%, dose modifications in 2%, and treatment discontinuation in 0.4%. Conclusion Crovalimab showed encouraging efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in patients with PNH, supporting its role as a promising treatment option in PNH.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Efficacy and Safety of the <scp>C5</scp> Inhibitor Crovalimab in Patients With Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
- Date Crossref
- 26/11/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.