Prevalence and predictors of problematic smartphone use in a sample of Spanish undergraduate students
Rattachement africain : es. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and predictors of problematic smartphone use (PSU) in a sample of young Spanish university students. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in a sample of university students. An online questionnaire collected data on socio-demographic characteristics, health-related behaviours, loneliness, life satisfaction and smartphone use. PSU was assessed using the Smartphone Addiction Scale-Short Version. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine predictors of PSU. 545 students (52.5% female) participated in the study. PSU was present in 33.8% of participants. PSU was associated with duration of device use (OR = 1.39; 95%CI 1.22-1.58), smartphone use before sleep (OR = 3.31; 95%CI 1.32-8.30), preferred use for entertainment purposes (OR = 5.03; 95%CI 1.32-19.17), smoking (OR = 1.75; 95%CI 1.07-2.87), alcohol consumption (OR = 1.60; 95%CI 1.30-1.98) and loneliness (OR = 1.20; 95%CI 1.03-1.40). In contrast, high physical activity was a protective factor for PSU (OR = 0.55; 95%CI 0.31-0.98). Prevalence of PSU is high among Spanish university students. Loneliness, smartphone use habits and certain health-related behaviours are predictors of PSU. Our findings highlight the need to formulate policies and institutional guidelines that promoted a balanced use of technology.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Prevalence and predictors of problematic smartphone use in a sample of Spanish undergraduate students
- Date Crossref
- 27/11/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.