Competing quantum tunneling processes of heavy and light particles in isocyanic acid radical anions
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Quantum tunneling is known to be mass dependent. Here we report an unexpected mass effect on tunneling reactions in isocyanic acid radical anions (HNCO•−), which exhibit negative electron affinities. The cis- and trans-isomers of HNCO•− were generated in a solid neon matrix and their interconversion and electron-detachment tunneling kinetics were investigated using infrared absorption spectroscopy. The results reveal that electron tunneling, which involves some degree of nuclear motion of HNCO•− to neutral HNCO, occurs at a slower rate than the cis-to-trans isomerization of HNCO•−, with the latter following a distinct bond angle inversion pathway driven by the heavy carbon atom. This contrasts to the typical dominance of light hydrogen atom tunneling in cis-trans isomerization systems. These findings are rationalized by instanton theory calculations. Our model, which explicitly includes the neon matrix via a QM/MM approach, reveals that the carbon-driven pathway is favored by a lower barrier and shorter tunneling distance. A counterintuitive mass effect in the quantum tunneling of the HNCO• − anion is reported: the cis-to-trans isomerization is driven by heavy-atom carbon tunneling rather than hydrogen tunneling and occurs more rapidly than electron detachment tunneling from HNCO• − to neutral HNCO.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Competing quantum tunneling processes of heavy and light particles in isocyanic acid radical anions
- Date Crossref
- 27/11/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.