Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 review

Does ambient PM2.5 reduce the protective association of leisure-time physical activity with mortality? A systematic review, meta-analysis, and individual-level pooled analysis of cohort studies involving 1.5 million adults

6Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
19Institutions déclarées
6Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : tw, gb, au, cn, dk, hk. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background This study assessed whether higher levels of fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) reduce the protective effects of leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) on all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality, and explored the PM 2.5 threshold beyond which attenuation occurs. Methods We conducted two complementary investigations. First, a systematic review and meta-analysis (per PRISMA guidelines) identified eligible cohort studies from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and SPORTDiscus (from inception to 6 January 2025) that examined the independent or joint associations of LTPA and PM₂.₅ with mortality among adults (≥ 18 years). Second, an individual-level pooled analysis using harmonized data from three cohorts was performed using Cox regression modeling to assess the associations observed in the meta-analysis. Results In Study One, a total of seven cohort studies ( n = 1,515,094; deaths = 115,196) were included in the meta-analysis, revealing that the reduction in all-cause mortality risk diminished with higher PM 2.5 exposure. Meeting the recommended LTPA level (7.5–15 MET-h/week) reduced all-cause mortality risk by approximately 30% at PM 2.5 < 25 μg/m 3 but only 12–15% at 25 + μg/m 3 . Study Two (three cohorts; n = 869,038; deaths = 45,080) confirmed this pattern. Individuals meeting the recommended LTPA level (7.5–15 MET-h/week) had a lower risk of all-cause mortality compared to those in the highest-risk group (reference: < 1 MET-h/week and PM 2.5 : 35–50 μg/m 3 ). Hazard ratios (HRs) varied by PM 2.5 exposure, with lower HRs indicating a greater protective effect: 35–50 μg/m 3 (HR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.61–0.93), 25–35 μg/m 3 (HR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.57–0.79), 15–25 μg/m 3 (HR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.29–0.39), 10–15 μg/m 3 (HR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.28–0.41), and < 10 μg/m 3 (HR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.25–0.37). Higher levels of LTPA were generally associated with lower all-cause and cause-specific mortality across most PM₂.₅ exposure categories, but the protective effects were attenuated at PM₂.₅ levels 25 + μg/m 3 for all outcomes and became non-significant for cancer mortality at 35–50 μg/m 3 . Conclusions LTPA is beneficial for all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality even at relatively high PM 2.5 levels, with greater benefits observed under cleaner air conditions. However, its protective effects are attenuated at 25 + μg/m 3 for all outcomes and become less evident at 35–50 μg/m 3 , particularly for cancer mortality. PROSPERO Registration Number CRD42023395364.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Does ambient PM2.5 reduce the protective association of leisure-time physical activity with mortality? A systematic review, meta-analysis, and individual-level pooled analysis of cohort studies involving 1.5 million adults
Date Crossref
28/11/2025
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Physical Activity and HealthAir Quality and Health ImpactsHealth, Environment, Cognitive Aging

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.