Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Appraising the current landscape of reviews on mpox vaccination: a rapid evidence map

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
5Institutions déclarées
4Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : Congo, Afrique du Sud, République démocratique du Congo, Nigéria. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Introduction Vaccination is a potent countermeasure for interrupting the spread of mpox, which is currently a priority public health problem in Africa. Backed by emergency declarations from both the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), governments, with support from health partners, are accelerating momentum for mpox vaccine deployment in countries with active transmission to prevent further spread. Although evidence is crucial for informing mpox vaccination policies and practice decisions, the existing knowledge gaps are not well explored. Objective To identify existing reviews on mpox vaccination and assess the evidence landscape to identify knowledge gaps. Methods A rapid review approach was used to map the existing synthesized literature on mpox vaccination. Results The database search (finalized in September 2024) included seven electronic databases and yielded 1650 results. After systematic screening based on predefined inclusion criteria, 31 reviews were selected. These included 17 systematic reviews, 11 narrative reviews, and three rapid reviews on mpox vaccination. Most of the literature focused on the immunogenicity, safety, efficacy, and effectiveness of first- and second-generation mpox vaccines. However, there is limited evidence on the immunogenicity, safety, efficacy, and effectiveness of third-generation vaccines (including the WHO-prequalified Modified Vaccinia Ankara–Bavarian Nordic vaccine) in Africa and among subpopulations such as children, women of reproductive age, and pregnant women. Additionally, existing studies on vaccine acceptance and uptake mainly concentrate on men who have sex with men, with insufficient evidence concerning other high-risk groups like female sex workers. Conclusion This study has identified gaps both in the scarcity of studies on the immunogenicity, safety, efficacy, and effectiveness of MVA-BN in African settings, as well as in the target populations of the outbreak. There is an urgent need to accelerate mpox vaccination research in Africa through primary studies and evidence synthesis.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Appraising the current landscape of reviews on mpox vaccination: a rapid evidence map
Date Crossref
27/11/2025
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Poxvirus research and outbreaksBacillus and Francisella bacterial researchImmune responses and vaccinations

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.