Aller au contenu principal
2024 article

Mechanical Evaluation of Canine Cementless Total Hip Replacement Broaches: Effect of Tooth Design on Broach and Stem Insertion

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Introduction: The Biomedtrix BFX cementless total hip replacement (THR) requires femoral broaches to prepare a press-fit envelope within the femur. Current broaches contain teeth that crush and remove cancellous bone; however, they are not well-suited for broaching femurs with sclerotic bone. The objectives of this study were to determine the broaching performance of two new broach tooth patterns and to determine the effect of broach tooth design change on stem insertion and subsidence. Materials and Methods: Three tooth designs [Control, TG1 (additional V-grooves), TG2 (diamond tooth pattern)] were evaluated using a quasi-static testing protocol and polyurethane test blocks simulating normal and sclerotic bone. Cumulative broaching energy and peak loads during broach insertion were determined. A BFX stem was inserted into prepared test blocks and insertion and subsidence energy and peak loads were determined. Results: In both low and high density test blocks, TG1 generated the lowest cumulative broaching energy (10.76 ± 0.29 J and 32.60 ± 2.54 J, respectively). Stem insertion energy for high density test blocks prepared with Control broaches (14.53 ± 0.81 J) was significantly lower than blocks prepared with TG1 (22.53 ± 1.04 J) or TG2 (19.38 ± 3.00 J) broaches. For stem subsidence testing in high density blocks, TG1 prepared blocks required the highest amount of energy to undergo subsidence (14.49 ± 0.49 J), which was significantly greater than Control or TG2 broaches. Discussion/Conclusion: The additional V-grooves in TG1 broaches demonstrated improved broaching performance and press-fit envelopes that were more resistant to stem insertion and subsidence. Acknowledgement: This study was funded by the GINN Fund, an internal grant through the Texas A&M University College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences. Publication History Article published online: 16 September 2024 Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Mechanical Evaluation of Canine Cementless Total Hip Replacement Broaches: Effect of Tooth Design on Broach and Stem Insertion
Date Crossref
01/09/2024
Éditeur
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Orthopaedic implants and arthroplastyDental materials and restorationsEndodontics and Root Canal Treatments

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.