Matched-Pair Analysis of Survival in the Patients with Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Radiotherapy or Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Surgical-Based Treatment
Rattachement africain : es. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: This study compared survival outcomes between upfront surgery +/-radiotherapy (RT) and definitive RT with or without chemotherapy (RT/CRT) in HPV-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). METHODS: A retrospective matched-pair analysis included 150 patients treated between 1990 and 2020. Fifty (RT/CRT) cases (2009-2020) were matched 2:1 to 100 surgical cases (1990-2009) by sex, subsite, T/N classification, and AJCC 8th stage. Sixty-six percent of surgically treated patients received adjuvant RT. Only HPV-negative tumors confirmed by p16 and HPV DNA testing were analyzed. Survival was assessed with Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression. RESULTS: = 0.022) in surgical patients. In stage III disease, RT/CRT provided markedly superior DSS (87% vs. 42%). No significant differences were found in local control or recurrence-free survival, but metastasis-free survival was significantly worse in the surgical cohort, and the incidence of second primary tumors was significantly lower in the RT/CRT group. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that RT/CRT provides superior survival outcomes and better control of distant metastasis and second primary tumors compared with surgery in HPV-negative OPSCC, particularly in stage III disease. RT/CRT should be considered an effective organ-preserving option for this population.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Matched-Pair Analysis of Survival in the Patients with Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Radiotherapy or Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Surgical-Based Treatment
- Date Crossref
- 26/11/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.