Subgroup of meningiomas involving FOS and FOSB gene fusions
Rattachement africain : us, tr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Meningiomas are the most common primary tumors of the central nervous system and are typically treated with surgery or radiation, as targeted therapies remain limited. Despite extensive study, seventeen percent of meningiomas lack known genetic drivers. Our analysis of meningiomas without driver mutations or major chromosomal alterations identifies a subset with recurrent genomic rearrangements involving the FOS and FOSB genes. These tumors exhibit elevated FOS/FOSB protein levels and retain meningothelial lineage. Here we show that FOS/FOSB fusion-positive meningiomas represent a distinct molecular subgroup, defined by unique gene expression patterns, including activation of AP-1 target genes and signatures resembling preadipocyte-like and mast cell–associated profiles. Clinically, these tumors display low-grade behavior and DNA methylation profiles consistent with benign subtypes. Our findings identify a meningioma subgroup with distinct genetic, transcriptomic, and clinical features, expanding the molecular classification of meningiomas and opening new avenues for targeted treatment strategies. Approximately 17% of meningiomas remain genomically uncharacterized. Here, the authors analyze 105 meningiomas without known driver mutations or significant copy number alterations and identify a subgroup of meningiomas, defined by FOS/FOSB gene fusions with distinctive transcriptomic and histopathological features.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Subgroup of meningiomas involving FOS and FOSB gene fusions
- Date Crossref
- 26/11/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.